Plan Advice
← Back to Plan Advice

Camden Council — Development Application Data

Camden Council processed 3026 development applications in the past year from a total dataset of 8235 since 2021, with a median assessment time of 58 days. The council's 2.72% Clause 4.6 variation rate sits well below the Sydney metropolitan average, signalling strict adherence to development standards for height, FSR and setbacks. The most common refusal ground is insufficient information from applicants, cited in 132 refusals, followed closely by public interest concerns under s4.15(1)(e) and site unsuitability. Applications span a broad cost spectrum: 3041 fall under $100,000, while 331 exceed $5 million, with Other development dominating at 6200 applications, then subdivision at 661 and alterations at 503. Streetscape and neighbourhood character incompatibility appears in 65 refusals, alongside 56 citing stormwater, drainage or flooding issues. A Plan Advice AI assessment for your Camden Council property runs in seconds and identifies these risks before you lodge.

DAs on file
8,352
Since 2021
Lodged last 12m
3,067
Median assessment
58 days
FY FY25-26
Clause 4.6 rate
2.7%
Development standard variations

Determination outcomes

Real approval, refusal and withdrawal rates from finalised DAs in the Plan Advice enriched corpus.

Approved
89.4%
of 6,663 determined DAs
Refused
3.9%
Withdrawn
6.6%

Based on the 98.1% of DAs in our Camden Council corpus with a confirmed determination. Applications still under assessment, and any whose outcome the council has not published, are excluded rather than estimated.

Why DAs get refused in Camden Council

Grounds cited across 176 refused applications, read from the council's own notices of determination. Most recent determination indexed: August 2026. Most refusals cite several grounds at once, so these overlap.

Contrary to the public interest (s4.15(1)(e))136 refusals
132 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Insufficient information submitted by applicant135 refusals
121 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Site not suitable for the development (s4.15(1)(c))128 refusals
126 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Streetscape / neighbourhood character incompatibility66 refusals
37 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Stormwater, drainage or flooding58 refusals
47 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Setbacks or building envelope non-compliance53 refusals
36 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Parking shortfall, traffic or vehicular access50 refusals
36 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Land use prohibited / not permissible in zone49 refusals
48 of these treated it as a decisive ground
Read the council's exact wording

Behind each ground above sits the verbatim paragraph the assessing officer wrote, the LEP and DCP clauses it was tested against, and the address and DA number so you can pull the notice yourself. 1,127 grounds across Camden Council are indexed this way.

See the grounds in full

Conditions you should expect

Approval is not the finish line — every consent arrives with conditions. This is what Camden Council actually imposes, measured from the consent notices it has published.

Conditions marked costs money are the ones to budget for — contributions, bonds, specialist reports and public-domain works.

91%Appoint a principal certifier
75%Survey certificate at set-outCOSTS MONEY
59%Section 7.11 developer contributionsCOSTS MONEY
58%Vehicular crossing, footpath and kerb worksCOSTS MONEY
52%Sydney Water approval (Section 73)COSTS MONEY
50%Construction certificate before works start
47%Asbestos / hazardous materials handling
46%Waste management plan
46%Erosion and sediment control
45%Construction management plan
45%Construction traffic management
40%Tree protection and arborist supervisionCOSTS MONEY

Based on 3,110 approvals with a published notice of determination · 5 of the conditions above carry a cost. A condition on most approvals is effectively standard; it is not a guarantee of what any individual consent will say.

Development type mix

What people are building in Camden Council. Ranked by DA volume.

Other6,293
Subdivision671
Alterations & additions504
Dual occupancy349
Change of use164
Commercial130
Residential flat building44

Development cost distribution

Estimated development cost ranges reported on Camden Council DAs.

Under $100k3,074
$100k – $500k2,388
$500k – $1M1,736
$1M – $5M669
$5M+335

Camden Council DAs — common questions

Answered from this council's own determinations. Where a council has not published a figure, the question is left out rather than guessed.

How many development applications does Camden Council handle?

Plan Advice holds 8,352 development applications for Camden Council, 3,067 of them lodged in the last 12 months. The figures on this page are counted from that register, not estimated.

How long does a DA take in Camden Council?

The median assessment time is 58 days for FY25-26, after a median 8 days to get the application accepted for lodgement. That is the council's own reported figure from the NSW Planning Portal league tables, so it covers every DA they determined — not a sample.

What share of DAs does Camden Council approve?

89.4% of the 6,663 determined applications we hold were approved and 3.9% were refused. We can read a determination for 98.1% of this council's DAs; the rest are counted as unknown rather than assumed approved.

Why are DAs refused in Camden Council?

Across 176 refused applications, the grounds cited most often are insufficient information submitted by applicant (135 refusals), contrary to the public interest (s4.15(1)(e)) (136 refusals), site not suitable for the development (s4.15(1)(c)) (128 refusals). These are read from the council's own notices of determination, and most refusals cite several grounds at once.

What kinds of development are most common in Camden Council?

The most frequent application types are subdivision (671), alterations & additions (504), dual occupancy (349).

How often is a clause 4.6 variation used in Camden Council?

226 applications — 2.71% of the register — sought a clause 4.6 variation to a development standard.

Most recent development applications

Sampled from the NSW Planning Portal open-data feed.

PAN-674528
Lot 132 Alec Circuit, Oran Park NSW 2570
Other · lodged 2026-09-11T20:41:08.220
$708,000
PAN-674501
16 GRIBBIN ROAD LEPPINGTON 2179
Other · lodged 2026-09-11T20:40:33.090
$701,888
PAN-674340
4 HEYETESBURY AVENUE GLEDSWOOD HILLS 2557
Other · lodged 2026-09-11T20:37:51.587
$854,458
PAN-674310
189 CATHERINE FIELDS ROAD CATHERINE FIELD 2557
Other · lodged 2026-09-11T20:37:17.700
$4,148,914
PAN-674163
40 DICKSON ROAD LEPPINGTON 2179
Other · lodged 2026-09-11T20:35:46.357
$1,920,000
Assessing a property in Camden Council?

Get a free, instant AI-powered analysis of your property's zoning, planning controls and likely DA outcome — grounded in Plan Advice's 413,770-DA NSW corpus.

Start free assessment →
Nearby councils: campbelltown · canada bay · canterbury bankstown · central coast · cumberland · fairfield · georges river · hawkesbury · hills shire · hornsby · hunters hill · inner west — or see DA statistics for all 37 Sydney Metro councils.